1 problem, a do-over drawing had to be held in mid-January. Turner, originally hired by CEO Noble in 2010, is now top deputy to Smith at the lottery.Īs a result of the Jan. 1 drawing that was run by subordinates of DuPuis and representatives of the state Department of Consumer Protection, which oversees regulation of state lottery games. Neither DuPuis nor the lottery’s acting CEO at the time, Chelsea Turner, were present - nor were they required to be - at the Jan. His clearly documented development and approval of the checklist and instructions for its use were directly responsible for the error that occurred.” “The checklist that he and his staff prepared was missing critical content that was the basis for the error that occurred. DuPuis’ support and participation in the development and use of an unapproved checklist for the CT Super Draw were clear errors in executing his responsibilities,” Smith wrote.
#Ct superdraw jan 1 2018 full#
1 disaster - in which a five-member team that ran the computerized number selection used a brief “checklist” instead of a full set of illustrated instructions, and entered a range of ticket numbers that omitted 100,000 tickets from the range of potential winners. The 5 Card Cash game was compromised in Connecticut when employees at lottery retail outlets figured out a way to print out winning tickets for themselves by slowing down the gaming terminal’s printing with repeated commands - to the point where a display on the machine told them which numbers would be on the next tickets printed. The vulnerabilities he pointed out concerned the potential for retailers to quickly read the tickets before handing them to customers and making the decision to keep the ticket for themselves - referred to as ‘palming.’”īut Smith said that DuPuis’ “comments about ‘palming’ were not novel or new,” and that “every lottery considers this and takes some action to address it.” “Fred DuPuis did raise a well-known concern about the 5 Card Cash game while it was being evaluated as a product before it was sold in Connecticut. Noble prior to the launch of the game,” Smith wrote.
“The actual problems … encountered with 5 Card Cash that ultimately led to the criminal conviction of certain retailers were not related to the concerns raised by Mr. “When you reach the unsubstantiated conclusion that a charge of gross neglect ‘could have’ resulted from arbitrary or retaliatory motives, I would contend that the facts and record … just as likely lead to a conclusion that these actions may not have been the result of retaliation, but rather from the specified performance concerns,” DeFronzo wrote.Īs for Smith’s letter to the two legislators Tuesday, he downplayed the significance of what DuPuis had said about 5 Card Cash’s vulnerability to compromise.
#Ct superdraw jan 1 2018 how to#
(People in such Connecticut outlets figured out how to compromise the game, which ultimately resulted in 15 arrests).
8, stating that although they suggested there was “no basis for the finding of neglect” against DuPuis, “In fact, I believe the detailed … internal report constitutes a factual basis and rationale for the findings of negligence.”ĭeFronzo also reiterated to the auditors his public statements that DuPuis hasn’t been the victim of retaliation for having told the previous lottery CEO, Anne Noble, in 2015 of the 5 Card Cash game’s vulnerability to fraud by people in retail lottery outlets. Don DeFronzo, the chairman of the lottery’s board of directors, wrote to Geragosian and Kane on Nov. Smith was not the only letter writer among current lottery officials with regard to the auditors’ report to Verrengia and Fasano.
Told of the lawmakers’ comments,Tara Chozet, the lottery’s director of public relations and social media, said only: “We provided information that we did not see included in the November 2 report.” And so welcome to Connecticut, Greg Smith - who learned a day after sending his letter, if he didn’t know already, what a high-voltage wire he had touched.
0 kommentar(er)
